<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE - Oh how I loathe thee&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=14</link>
	<description>Dreaming it up is half the fun...</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 12:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: daemach</title>
		<link>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=14#comment-89</link>
		<author>daemach</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=14#comment-89</guid>
		<description>tableFilter wasn't designed to link tables like that, but I'm planning on adding some ajax functionality that could include some hooks for that kind of thing.  I'll give it more thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tableFilter wasn&#8217;t designed to link tables like that, but I&#8217;m planning on adding some ajax functionality that could include some hooks for that kind of thing.  I&#8217;ll give it more thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squid9_</title>
		<link>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=14#comment-85</link>
		<author>squid9_</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=14#comment-85</guid>
		<description>is it possible to make the the table to display hiearchy of the data, lets say master table and details table</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is it possible to make the the table to display hiearchy of the data, lets say master table and details table</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daemach</title>
		<link>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=14#comment-36</link>
		<author>daemach</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=14#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the suggestion.  Unfortunately, the issue is purely with adding a classname to an element.  IE just can't do it on the fly without choking.  The more I work with IE the more stunned I am by the terrible design. Who would have thought that hiding the table cells before adding classnames would improve performance ;)  (at least in smaller tables...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the suggestion.  Unfortunately, the issue is purely with adding a classname to an element.  IE just can&#8217;t do it on the fly without choking.  The more I work with IE the more stunned I am by the terrible design. Who would have thought that hiding the table cells before adding classnames would improve performance <img src='http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  (at least in smaller tables&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=14#comment-32</link>
		<author>Julian</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 19:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=14#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I will probably regret suggesting this -- since it's usually seen as a terrible, horrible, not so good idea -- but have you considered using innerHTML instead of DOM? The reason I mention it is:

http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/innerhtml.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will probably regret suggesting this &#8212; since it&#8217;s usually seen as a terrible, horrible, not so good idea &#8212; but have you considered using innerHTML instead of DOM? The reason I mention it is:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/innerhtml.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/innerhtml.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daemach</title>
		<link>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=14#comment-30</link>
		<author>daemach</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 19:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=14#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Follow-up:  I tried using cloneNode and replaceChild as well as createElement removeChild and insertBefore/appendChild with no improvement.  The first method was faster than the second, but IE still chokes on the large table.  I also tried both methods without the td display:none, and it reverted to the 550MS per column behavior.  This tells us that IE tries to apply CSS rules (that don't exist) to nodes that don't exist in the DOM.  I guess that should be expected since it makes absolutely no sense.

On a whim, I also tried creating the css classes in my stylesheet so they did exist to see if that would help - it doesn't.

Good thought anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow-up:  I tried using cloneNode and replaceChild as well as createElement removeChild and insertBefore/appendChild with no improvement.  The first method was faster than the second, but IE still chokes on the large table.  I also tried both methods without the td display:none, and it reverted to the 550MS per column behavior.  This tells us that IE tries to apply CSS rules (that don&#8217;t exist) to nodes that don&#8217;t exist in the DOM.  I guess that should be expected since it makes absolutely no sense.</p>
<p>On a whim, I also tried creating the css classes in my stylesheet so they did exist to see if that would help - it doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Good thought anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daemach</title>
		<link>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=14#comment-29</link>
		<author>daemach</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 18:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=14#comment-29</guid>
		<description>It might be worth trying, though the overhead from cloning and reattaching an entire table might be just as bad.  You gave me an interesting idea though - I wonder what would happen if I created a brand new td, applied the classnames and contents, then inserted the new one in the old ones place...  I appreciate the lead :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be worth trying, though the overhead from cloning and reattaching an entire table might be just as bad.  You gave me an interesting idea though - I wonder what would happen if I created a brand new td, applied the classnames and contents, then inserted the new one in the old ones place&#8230;  I appreciate the lead <img src='http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=14#comment-28</link>
		<author>Roger</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 18:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/?p=14#comment-28</guid>
		<description>You may have tried this already, but what about cloning the table, doing all the manipulations on the cloned copy and replacing the original with the clone when the processing is done?  Does ie do the stupid css lookup on elements that aren't attached to the dom?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have tried this already, but what about cloning the table, doing all the manipulations on the cloned copy and replacing the original with the clone when the processing is done?  Does ie do the stupid css lookup on elements that aren&#8217;t attached to the dom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
